At times, the Sub-recipient (SR) may itself want to outsource a specific activity to another entity, which becomes a Sub-sub-recipient (SSR). The UNDP Country Office (CO) maintains overall responsibility for all SSR activities and should review and approve all SSR agreements, as SSR appointments carry high risks for UNDP. Prior to approving an SSR agreement, the UNDP CO should ensure that the SR has performed a capacity assessment of the prospective SSR, using a methodology acceptable to UNDP (such as the UNDP template) and that the assessment is positive. If the assessment is negative, the SR should not engage the SSR. It is important to stress that SSRs should contribute to a specific component mentioned in the SR agreement and should not be used as vehicles to circumvent UNDP procurement rules.
Practice Pointer
As a best practice, UNDP COs should be involved in the SSR capacity assessment, which should use the same format and style as the SR capacity assessment.
The UNDP CO should carefully review the use of SSRs to carry out some of the activities stipulated in the SR agreement. The CO should also ensure that there is a sound rationale for using an SR as a conduit for funds to an SSR. The same rules that apply to working with SRs apply to working with SSRs:
The SR–SSR agreement should carry the same terms as the SR agreement;
Potential SSRs should be assessed by the SR; and
UNDP procurement rules also apply to SSRs, and procurement should not be delegated to SSRs.
If an SSR is appointed, the UNDP CO is required to monitor the SR’s management of the SSR. This monitoring should be a key component of the CO risk management plan and should be covered in the SR agreement.